<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph" style="margin: 16px 0px; color: rgb(15, 17, 21); font-family: quote-cjk-patch, Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &quot;Open Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span class="">DP World has floated a joint venture proposal with Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority (JNPA) to continue operating India's first private container terminal, Nhava Sheva International Container Terminal (NSICT), beyond the expiry of its 30-year concession in 2028 </span><span class="">. The proposal, made public through statements by Group CEO Yuvraj Narayan, represents an attempt to reshape the commercial framework under which private operators hold Indian port assets. Instead of a fixed-term concession that returns to the port authority at expiry, DP World envisions a permanent partnership in which the government retains ownership of the underlying infrastructure while the operator runs the terminal against agreed performance metrics </span><span class="">.</span><span class="_5f9bba8" data-citation-group="1" style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"><a href="https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ports-shipping/dp-world-dangles-jv-carrot-to-retain-nsict-terminal-forever-bypass-global-tender/135048660?utm_source=top_story&amp;utm_medium=homepage" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="1" style="color: rgb(57, 100, 254); transition: box-shadow 0.2s cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1); border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); border-width: 2px 3px; margin-left: -3px; margin-right: -3px; text-decoration: none; position: relative;"></a></span></p><p class="ds-markdown-paragraph" style="margin: 16px 0px; color: rgb(15, 17, 21); font-family: quote-cjk-patch, Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &quot;Open Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span class="">Narayan's argument rests on the economics of port investment. In an interview with PTI on 18 October, he contended that a 30-year concession leaves operators with a relatively short period of high utilisation in which to recover their investments and modernise facilities, given the years required to build a port and stabilise operations </span><span class="">. His proposed alternative is a landlord model: "Why not JVs? Become a landlord. You have an operator, you agree on KPIs. It's forever, till I break your trust. What's the problem" </span><span class="">. The framing is significant because it challenges the foundational assumption of India's PPP port policy — that private participation should be time-limited and subject to periodic competitive re-tendering.</span><span class="_5f9bba8" data-citation-group="3" style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"><a href="https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ports-shipping/dp-world-dangles-jv-carrot-to-retain-nsict-terminal-forever-bypass-global-tender/135048660?utm_source=top_story&amp;utm_medium=homepage" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="1" style="color: rgb(57, 100, 254); transition: box-shadow 0.2s cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1); border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); border-width: 2px 3px; margin-left: -3px; margin-right: -3px; text-decoration: none; position: relative;"></a></span></p><p class="ds-markdown-paragraph" style="margin: 16px 0px; color: rgb(15, 17, 21); font-family: quote-cjk-patch, Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &quot;Open Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span class="">Port officials and industry experts have rejected the proposal on both legal and commercial grounds. A port official involved in PPP policymaking stated that the concession agreement is clear: after 30 years, the asset belongs to the port authority, and extending the concession without a global tender would be "not only not possible, but also illegal" </span><span class="">. The legal logic is straightforward — if the asset reverts to JNPA, the authority cannot grant a new concession for an asset it already owns without a competitive process. A port industry expert added that no country would give its waterfront to a private operator in perpetuity due to national security considerations, calling the long-term JV plan "not workable" </span><span class="">.</span><span class="_5f9bba8" data-citation-group="5" style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"><a href="https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ports-shipping/dp-world-dangles-jv-carrot-to-retain-nsict-terminal-forever-bypass-global-tender/135048660?utm_source=top_story&amp;utm_medium=homepage" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="1" style="color: rgb(57, 100, 254); transition: box-shadow 0.2s cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1); border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); border-width: 2px 3px; margin-left: -3px; margin-right: -3px; text-decoration: none; position: relative;"></a></span></p><p class="ds-markdown-paragraph" style="margin: 16px 0px; color: rgb(15, 17, 21); font-family: quote-cjk-patch, Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &quot;Open Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span class="">The commercial counter-argument is equally pointed. The same expert noted that facts and figures available with JNPA show that the erstwhile P&amp;O Ports, which was originally awarded the NSICT concession in 1997, recovered its investments along with profit at a rate of 16 per cent Return on Capital Employed </span><span class="">. This directly contradicts DP World's assertion that 30 years is insufficient. The implication is that the concession term has been adequate for investment recovery, and that the push for a permanent JV is motivated by the value of retaining a profitable, established terminal rather than by any genuine economic necessity.</span><span class="_5f9bba8" data-citation-group="7" style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"><a href="https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ports-shipping/dp-world-dangles-jv-carrot-to-retain-nsict-terminal-forever-bypass-global-tender/135048660?utm_source=top_story&amp;utm_medium=homepage" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="1" style="color: rgb(57, 100, 254); transition: box-shadow 0.2s cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1); border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); border-width: 2px 3px; margin-left: -3px; margin-right: -3px; text-decoration: none; position: relative;"></a></span></p><p class="ds-markdown-paragraph" style="margin: 16px 0px; color: rgb(15, 17, 21); font-family: quote-cjk-patch, Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &quot;Open Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span class="">The dispute also touches on alternative mechanisms that have been floated to extend DP World's tenure. One idea is a Right of First Refusal clause in a new global tender, allowing the existing operator to match the highest royalty bid and continue for another 30 years </span><span class="">. However, this too faces hurdles. The ROFR was not part of the original licence agreement, and inserting it into a new tender would invite controversy. A port expert noted that bidders aware of the terminal's guaranteed cargo would quote reasonable market rates, which DP World could easily match, making a mockery of the ROFR clause </span><span class="">.</span><span class="_5f9bba8" data-citation-group="8" style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"><a href="https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ports-shipping/dp-world-dangles-jv-carrot-to-retain-nsict-terminal-forever-bypass-global-tender/135048660?utm_source=top_story&amp;utm_medium=homepage" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="1" style="color: rgb(57, 100, 254); transition: box-shadow 0.2s cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1); border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); border-width: 2px 3px; margin-left: -3px; margin-right: -3px; text-decoration: none; position: relative;"></a></span></p><p class="ds-markdown-paragraph" style="margin: 16px 0px; color: rgb(15, 17, 21); font-family: quote-cjk-patch, Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &quot;Open Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span class="">The broader context is DP World's significant and expanding presence in India. The company has six port concessions in India and is prepared to invest another $3–5 billion across ports, railways, and logistics infrastructure </span><span class="">. It is developing a separate container terminal at Tuna Tekra in Kandla, with a designed capacity of 2.19 million TEU, and has expressed interest in Vadhavan port </span><span class="">. Narayan has also acknowledged that rupee depreciation has eroded returns on Indian investments, describing the country as one of DP World's lower-return markets </span><span class="">. This context matters because it suggests DP World's push for a permanent JV at NSICT is not an isolated request but part of a broader effort to improve the commercial terms of its Indian portfolio.</span><span class="_5f9bba8" data-citation-group="10" style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"><a href="https://www.maritimegateway.com/essar-tuna-tekra-terminal-award-adds-18-33-million-tonne-project-to-kandlas-expansion/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="4" style="color: rgb(57, 100, 254); transition: box-shadow 0.2s cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1); border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); border-width: 2px 3px; margin-left: -3px; margin-right: -3px; text-decoration: none; position: relative;"></a><a href="https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/dp-world-ready-to-invest-up-to-5-billion-in-india-but-infrastructure-projects-need-to-move-faster-ceo-14053979.html?pitchClick=top-business-news&amp;utm_source=budget_2026&amp;utm_medium=desktop_Budget_Page&amp;utm_campaign=Budget_Article_Consumption_Top_Business_News#1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="7" style="color: rgb(57, 100, 254); transition: box-shadow 0.2s cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1); border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); border-width: 2px 3px; margin-left: -3px; margin-right: -3px; text-decoration: none; position: relative;"></a></span></p><p class="ds-markdown-paragraph" style="margin: 16px 0px; color: rgb(15, 17, 21); font-family: quote-cjk-patch, Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &quot;Open Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span class="">The timing of the proposal is also relevant. The NSICT concession expires in 2028, and JNPA is reportedly weighing options for the terminal's future. DP World's public advocacy for a JV model comes as the port authority prepares for what would be a competitive tender, and the company appears to be attempting to influence the terms of that process before it begins </span><span class="">. Whether this strategy succeeds will depend on how firmly JNPA and the Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways hold to the principle of competitive tendering for publicly owned port assets.</span><span class="_5f9bba8" data-citation-group="14" style="margin-left: 2px; margin-right: 2px;"><a href="https://infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/ports-shipping/dp-world-dangles-jv-carrot-to-retain-nsict-terminal-forever-bypass-global-tender/135048660?utm_source=top_story&amp;utm_medium=homepage" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" aria-label="1" style="color: rgb(57, 100, 254); transition: box-shadow 0.2s cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1); border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); border-width: 2px 3px; margin-left: -3px; margin-right: -3px; text-decoration: none; position: relative;"></a></span></p><p class="ds-markdown-paragraph" style="margin: 16px 0px; color: rgb(15, 17, 21); font-family: quote-cjk-patch, Inter, system-ui, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, &quot;Segoe UI&quot;, Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, &quot;Open Sans&quot;, &quot;Helvetica Neue&quot;, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span class="">Looking ahead, the outcome of the NSICT dispute will set a precedent for how India handles the expiry of other port concessions in the coming years. Several terminals at major ports were awarded in the 1990s and 2000s under 30-year terms and will face similar renewal decisions. If DP World succeeds in securing a permanent JV arrangement, it would create a template that other operators would seek to replicate. If JNPA holds the line on competitive tendering, it would reaffirm the principle that public port assets are periodically re-auctioned. Either way, the decision will shape the balance of power between the state and private capital in India's port sector for years to come.</span></p>